NVIDIA A2 vs ATI FireMV 2250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 60W)
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2007
Quadro
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
RV516
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
R500
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.107 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
