Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
6976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10M +4783%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2022
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
7168
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
62W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy