NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1687MHz vs 1150MHz)
2376 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 630 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1941%
8.637 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 630
0.423 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1043%
4917
UHD Graphics 630
430
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1332%
2836
UHD Graphics 630
198
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2020
Ampere-MW
Generation
HD Graphics
Professional
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
350 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Type
System Shared
128bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
184
80
TMUs
23
48
ROPs
3
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.450 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.45 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
846.4 GFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
423.2 GFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
105.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Comet Lake GT2
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm+++
8.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
