NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550
We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and a Mobile platform GPU: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1665MHz vs 1320MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce MX550 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
+10%
2.984 TFLOPS
GeForce MX550
2.703 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
+50%
3566
GeForce MX550
2375
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650
+266%
1606
GeForce MX550
438
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce MX
Desktop
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1320 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.12 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.24 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.703 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.703 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
TU117
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
MX550
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
