Tesla C2075 vs Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+1533%
16790
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
Tesla
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
247W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
DG2-512
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
