Tesla C2075 vs Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+60%
1028
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
640
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
Tesla
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
4
448
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
10W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA10B
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
520 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
