RTX A6000 vs Quadro M3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+1700%
38710
Quadro M3000M
2150
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A6000
+780%
17742
Quadro M3000M
2016
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A6000
+890%
9324
Quadro M3000M
941
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
84
SM Count
-
10752
Shading Units
1024
336
TMUs
64
112
ROPs
32
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
