RTX A6000 vs Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
10560 additional rendering cores
Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+7964%
38710
Quadro 2000D
480
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
84
SM Count
4
10752
Shading Units
192
336
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
16
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
62W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
