RTX A6000 vs Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
10368 additional rendering cores
Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+6667%
38710
Quadro K2000M
572
Blender
RTX A6000
+17856%
5387
Quadro K2000M
30
OctaneBench
RTX A6000
+4900%
600
Quadro K2000M
12
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
84
SM Count
-
10752
Shading Units
384
336
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
16
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
55W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
