RTX A4000 vs Tesla S1075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4000
+2981%
19170
Tesla S1075
622
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
30
6144
Shading Units
240
192
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
140W
TDP
800W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GT200B
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
