RTX A4000 vs Quadro NVS 320M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 140W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4000
+25805%
19170
Quadro NVS 320M
74
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
4
6144
Shading Units
32
192
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
140W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
G84
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
