RTX A4000 vs Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
6136 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 140W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4000
+91185%
19170
Quadro NVS 295
21
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
1
6144
Shading Units
8
192
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
140W
TDP
23W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
G98
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
