RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1746MHz vs 1612MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+62%
13410
RTX A2000 Embedded
8253
Blender
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+85%
3717
RTX A2000 Embedded
2001
OctaneBench
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+63%
443
RTX A2000 Embedded
271
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
20
3840
Shading Units
2560
240
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
192
Tensor Cores
80
48
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
60W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
GA107S
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
7 nm
Process Size
8 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
Unknown
331 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
