Home Comparison RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Data Center GPU Max 1100

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Data Center GPU Max 1100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1746MHz vs 1550MHz)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 1.02TB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
13410
Data Center GPU Max 1100 +65%
22220

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Jan 2023
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
7168
240
TMUs
448
64
ROPs
0
192
Tensor Cores
448
48
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
204 MB

Theoretical Performance

111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
10 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
100 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net