RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Quadro FX 3800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+3077%
13410
Quadro FX 3800M
422
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
16
3840
Shading Units
128
240
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
G92
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
