RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2100MHz vs 1746MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 1.02TB/s)
15616 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
13410
AMD Instinct MI300X
+1118%
163400
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Dec 2023
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
192GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM3
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
304
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
19456
240
TMUs
880
64
ROPs
0
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
750W
700 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
MI300
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
146 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
