RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs GRID RTX T10 2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1746MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+34%
13410
GRID RTX T10 2
9999
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Jan 2020
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
56
3840
Shading Units
3584
240
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
448
48
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
TU102
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
