Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+85%
10650
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
32
2304
Shading Units
4096
144
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
232 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
