Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+116%
5728
FireStream 9370
2640
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Jun 2010
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
20
2304
Shading Units
1600
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Cypress
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
