Home Comparison Radeon Instinct MI300X vs RTX A2000 Embedded

Radeon Instinct MI300X vs RTX A2000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (2100MHz vs 1612MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores
RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +890%
81720
RTX A2000 Embedded
8253

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
19456
Shading Units
2560
1216
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
48
1216
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
60W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GA107S
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
153 billion
Transistors
Unknown
1017 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net