Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Quadro M520 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
19072 additional rendering cores
Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X
+10115%
81720
Quadro M520 Mobile
800
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2017
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
384
1216
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
1216
Tensor Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.328 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.66 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
799.5 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
750W
TDP
25W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GM108
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
Unknown
1017 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
