Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Quadro 5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
19104 additional rendering cores
Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X
+11218%
81720
Quadro 5000
722
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Feb 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
320bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
120.0GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
11
19456
Shading Units
352
1216
TMUs
44
0
ROPs
40
1216
Tensor Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.29 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.57 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.3 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
361.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
750W
TDP
152W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
