Home Comparison Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Quadro 7000

Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Quadro 7000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 6GB VRAM Quadro 7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 163.4GB/s)
18944 additional rendering cores
Quadro 7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +6035%
81720
Quadro 7000
1332

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
May 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
851 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
163.4GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
19456
Shading Units
512
1216
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
48
1216
Tensor Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.23 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
204W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GF110
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
3 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net