Home Comparison Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q

Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (2100MHz vs 1380MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +1056%
81720
Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
7066

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
May 2019
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
780 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
19456
Shading Units
2560
1216
TMUs
160
0
ROPs
64
1216
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
220.8 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.13 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.066 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
220.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
80W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
TU104
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
153 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net