Home Comparison Radeon Instinct MI300X vs RTX A2000 Mobile

Radeon Instinct MI300X vs RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2100MHz vs 1687MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores
RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +846%
81720
RTX A2000 Mobile
8637

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1215 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
19456
Shading Units
2560
1216
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
48
1216
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
95W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GA107
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
153 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net