Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
19216 additional rendering cores
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X
+18816%
81720
Quadro 3000M
432
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Feb 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
5
19456
Shading Units
240
1216
TMUs
40
0
ROPs
32
1216
Tensor Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
750W
TDP
75W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
