Radeon Instinct MI300X vs Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
18944 additional rendering cores
Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X
+6035%
81720
Tesla C2090
1332
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
19456
Shading Units
512
1216
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
48
1216
Tensor Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
750W
TDP
250W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GF110
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
3 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
