Radeon Graphics 320SP vs GMA 3100
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP and 0System Shared VRAM GMA 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1400MHz
320 additional rendering cores
GMA 3100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
May 2007
Renoir
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
-
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
1.792 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
896.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
56.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
13W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Renoir
GPU Name
Bearlake
-
GPU Variant
Bearlake-G+ (G33)
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Generation 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
90 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
156 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
