Radeon Graphics 320SP vs ION
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP and 0System Shared VRAM ION to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1400MHz
304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 20W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 320SP
+2535%
896
ION
34
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jun 2008
Renoir
Generation
ION
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
16
20
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
1.792 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
896.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.24 GFLOPS
56.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
20W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Renoir
GPU Name
GT218
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
