Quadro P2000 vs RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)
RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1687MHz vs 1480MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3031
RTX A2000 Mobile
+184%
8637
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000
2973
RTX A2000 Mobile
+65%
4917
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000
1350
RTX A2000 Mobile
+110%
2836
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
1215 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
40
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
95W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GA107
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8