Quadro P2000 vs A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
A10M 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1635MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3031
A10M
+673%
23440
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
56
1024
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
224
40
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GA102
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
