Quadro P2000 vs Quadro K2200M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+254%
3031
Quadro K2200M
854
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
40
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GM107
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
