Quadro P2000 vs Quadro FX 4600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+1217%
3031
Quadro FX 4600
230
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
12
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
24
40
ROPs
24
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
134W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
G80
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
90 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.0
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
