Quadro P2000 vs GRID K2
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 4GB VRAM GRID K2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
GRID K2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+32%
3031
GRID K2
2289
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
May 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
40
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK104
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-895-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
