Quadro P2000 vs Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+2512%
3031
Quadro FX 880M
116
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
6
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GT216
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
