Quadro P2000 Mobile vs GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1291MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 400W)
GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2974
GRID A100A
+367%
13890
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
108
1152
Shading Units
6912
72
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GA100
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A
