Quadro NVS 290 vs RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 60W)
RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
29
RTX A1000 Embedded
+22879%
6664
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
21W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GA107S
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
Unknown
127 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
