Quadro NVS 290 vs Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 300W)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
7152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
29
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+76520%
22220
Graphics Card
Oct 2007
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro NVS
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
7168
8
TMUs
448
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
21W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
80 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
100 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
