Quadro M600M vs Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 134% (2050MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
673
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+2394%
16790
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
837 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
