Quadro K500M vs RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)
RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K500M
326
RTX A2000 Embedded
+2431%
8253
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1117 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
60W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA107S
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
