Quadro K2000 vs Quadro K4200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 108W)
Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro K4200
+187%
2107
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
1344
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
108W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
