Quadro K2000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
19072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
AMD Instinct MI300X
+22191%
163400
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
384
Shading Units
19456
32
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
750W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
MI300
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
146 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
