Quadro K2000 vs Quadro FX 3800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
+73%
733
Quadro FX 3800M
422
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
128
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
51W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G92
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
