CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
Comparison
Quadro K2000 vs Radeon Instinct MI8
Quadro K2000 vs Radeon Instinct MI8
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI8 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 175W)
Radeon Instinct MI8 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Radeon Instinct MI8
+1017%
8192
NVIDIA Quadro K2000
VS
AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Dec 2016
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
384
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Fiji
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
Related CPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
2
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 8 GB
3
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
4
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4
5
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
6
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
7
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
8
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M
9
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K540Q
10
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Related News
1
AMD Set to Evenly Compete with Intel in the Server CPU Market
2
AMD Launches New Instinct MI350 AI Accelerator
3
NVIDIA Plans to Launch Next-Generation Rubin Accelerators in September
4
AMD Unveils New Zen5 Processor
5
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
6
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
7
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
8
Is the AMD Ryzen 9000G Desktop CPU Coming Soon the Final Zen 5 Release?
9
Leaked Benchmark Data for AMD RX 9060XT Shows It Underperforming Compared to 5060Ti
10
Intel Launches the All-New Core Ultra 200 Series Processors
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy