Quadro FX 880M vs RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
116
RTX A500 Embedded
+4613%
5468
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
16
48
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
20W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GA107S
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
