Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Radeon Instinct MI250X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
13888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+10261%
47870
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
220
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
14080
64
TMUs
880
24
ROPs
0
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
192 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
