Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro K2000D
+58%
733
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
51W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
