Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+1954%
9492
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
48
192
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
110W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU104B
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
