Quadro FX 3700 vs Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 150W)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
280
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+5896%
16790
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
Board Design
78W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
DG2-512
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
