Quadro 3000M vs RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
5648 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
RTX A4500 Embedded
+3212%
14310
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
46
240
Shading Units
5888
40
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
80W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
GA104
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
